The complaint is filed with the President of India and Chief Justice of India by Adv. Nilesh C. Ojha on behalf of Indian Lawyers and Human Rights Activists Association
Grievance is of making illegal threats by Judges Ahsanuddin Amanullah and P.K Mishra for acting in contempt of the directions given by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court.
As per law made by the Constitution Bench, clear instructions have been given to the judges of the Supreme Court that they cannot pass any order going beyond the scope of law and they cannot encroach upon the jurisdiction of government institutions.
Complainant requested to immediately dismiss the accused judges by taking legal action against them under sections 166, 219, 409, 120(B), 34 of IPC.
Allegations are made regarding misuse of position and Supreme Court’s public property by the accused judges to provide undue benefits to the pharma mafia.
Complainant organization also demanded registering of criminal case against Indian Medical Association (IMA) under section 175, 302, 304, 409, 120(B), etc. of IPC and to cancel their registration for pushing the public to death by promoting deadly vaccines and medicines by misusing the property of IMA to serve the ulterior purposes of executive committee members.
The complaint had exposed the conspiracy by IMA to defame more effective, harmless and economical medical systems like Ayurveda and Naturopathy. IMA is making an attempt to hide the deadly side effects of allopathy medicines and vaccines to help the pharma mafia.
Condemnation of Indian Medical Association (IMA) by various organizations across the country including Universal Health Organization, Awaken India Movement, Indian Bar Association. Anger erupted across the country against the Indian Medical Association (IMA). Possibility of criminal cases being filed against IMA soon.
New Delhi: – Last year i.e. in 2022 a petition was filed in the Supreme Court by the Indian Medical Association (IMA) against Patanjali Ayurved and Ramdev Baba at the behest of the pharma mafia for giving undue benefit to allopathy companies. There was a criminal conspiracy to deter Baba Ramdev and other such people from serving the public.
During the hearing of that case on 21.11.2023, Supreme Court Judge Shri Ahsanuddin Amanullah had given threats to Baba Ramdev that the Judges will Order to lock the production unit of Patanjali and will also impose a cost of Rs.1 Crore per product. However, there is no provision in the law in which the Supreme Court judge has been authorized to lock a medicine company and to impose a fine of Rs 1 crore per product. In fact as per law if any rules have been found to be violated by Baba Ramdev while doing the production of any medicine, then the right to take action is given to the state authorities only under the laws of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, Cosmetic Act etc. and the case can go only in the local court.
Earlier, some judges of the Supreme Court had committed such illegality and misused the power and usurped the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Court and punished an IPS police officer M.S. Ahlawat and others. This was a case of illegal punishment. The senior division bench of the Supreme Court had admitted that the two Judge bench of the Supreme Court had committed blunder and set aside that sentence. [M.S. Ahlawat v. State of Haryana, (2000) 1 SCC 278]
The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Supreme Court Bar Assn. v. Union of India, (1998) 4 SCC 409, had set aside the order of three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court where liscence of a Lawyer was suspended. The Constitution Bench warned all the judges of the Supreme Court to not to pass such orders by bypassing any legal process beyond their jurisdiction.
But Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah had acted in contempt of said directions and misused his position and illegally threatened Ramdev Baba that he would close all the companies of Patanjali and impose a fine of Rs 1 crore on each medicine and would not allow any hearing of Baba Ramdev and the company in any court of the country
Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Re: C. S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, and in Baradakanta Misra v. Bhimsen Dixit, (1973) 1 SCC 446 had ruled that the Judge acting in contempt of binding precedent can be punished for six months imprisonment as per sec 2(b),12 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971.
Judges who have misused their position to commit unlawful acts and who pass orders contrary to law are liable for action under sections 166, 219, 409, 120(B), 34 of IPC where punishment is 7 years and life imprisonment.
In the scientific research paper, it was proved that the corona vaccine does not provide any reliable protection in the corona epidemic, but this vaccine has fatal side effects. Covishield vaccine was banned in 21 European countries due to the side effects of death.
The data received from research conducted worldwide proves that the countries with more vaccine are having more deaths.
Link:- https://expose-news.com/2022/09/30/5-months-to-killcovid-vaccination/
Title: – Five Months to Kill: The horrifying relationship between Deaths, COVID Deaths & Covid-19 Vaccination – The Expose (expose-news.com)
That data and research had shown that every dose of vaccine increases chances of death. Booster doses increases more chances of death.
Link:-https://expose-news.com/2022/09/30/5-months-to-killcovid-vaccination/
The warning given by WHO about deadly GBS disease being caused by Covishield (Astrazenca) vaccines.
Title: Statement of the WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) COVID-19 subcommittee on reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) following adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccines.
“On 13 and 20 July 2021, the COVID-19 subcommittee of the WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) met virtually to discuss rare reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) following vaccination with the Janssen and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. Both vaccines use an adenovirus platform as their backbone.”
Link: https://www.who.int/news/item/26-07-2021-statement-ofthe-who-gacvs-covid-19-subcommittee-on-gbs
The research also found that countries with more vaccines have more deaths and the risk of vaccine is 98 times more harmful than Corona.
Links: – https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/ethically-unjustifiable-new-harvard-johns-hopkins-study-found-covid-19-vaccines-98-times-worse-disease/
The research also found that the risk of cancer increased by 10,000 times in people who took the vaccine.
Link: – https://adversereactionreport.org/research/govt-database-shows-10000-increase-in-cancer-reports-due-to-covid-vaccines
In India too, there have been many deaths due to vaccine side effects and this has been acknowledged in the AEFI Committee of the Central Government. It is proved that the death of Dr. Snehal Lunawat was due to side effect of covishield vaccine and Bombay High Court had issued a notice of Rs. 1000 Crores compensation to Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla.
But the same deadly vaccine was given to crores of people of India by hiding its deadly side effects. The IMA did not raise any voice against it. On the contrary when Baba Ramdev raised his voice against it, the IMA opposed Baba Ramdev and gave an affidavit in the Supreme Court in support of that deadly vaccine. This proves that IMA is not concerned about the life of the common man but they are working for the welfare of pharma mafia.
As per Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights, 2005 & according to the direction given by the Supreme Court in the case of Montgomery v. Lanarkshire Health Board (General Medical Council intervening), [2015] 2 WLR 768, it is the duty of every doctor to explain all the side effects of the vaccine or therapy in the language of understanding the patient and also tell the patient that if they don’t want to get treatment with that medicine /vaccine or therapy, then what other medical methods and medicines like Ayurveda, Naturopathy are available to that patient. The license of the doctors who violate these rules can be cancelled and such doctors are liable to pay compensation to the, the victim patient and his family.
Under these laws, legal action has been sought against IMA.
