March 8, 2026

Featured Posts

WhatsApp Image 2026-03-08 at 13.20.38

[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 hour ago
Screenshot 2026-02-28 at 21.54.19

Justice Hidayatullah’s view in 1966 in Naresh Mirajkar’s case was binding precedent as being undisputed and no counter precedent available and Now has become the Binding Law of the Land as Nine-Judge Constitution Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) Confirms

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

सुप्रीम कोर्टाने तरुण वकिलाचे पत्र जनहित याचिका म्हणून स्वीकारले — याचिका दाखल करताना ‘सीनियर काउन्सिल सर्टिफिकेट’च्या सक्तीमुळे सामान्य नागरिक व ज्युनियर वकिलांच्या हक्कांच्या उल्लंघनाचा मुद्दा ऐरणीवर [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
2_03_59_58_supreme-court-_1_H@@IGHT_0_W@@IDTH_600

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने युवा वकील का पत्र PIL के रूप में दर्ज किया — क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन में ‘सीनियर काउंसिल सर्टिफिकेट’ की अनिवार्यता से आम नागरिकों और जूनियर वकीलों के अधिकारों के हनन का मुद्दा उठाया [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
[Covid-19] लोकांनी लसीच्या दुष्परीणामाचे दावे करू नये व लस कंपन्यांचा लाखो कोटींचा फायदा व्हावा यासाठी खोटे नरेटीव्ह चालविणारे डॉ. संजय ओक व दै. लोकमत चे संपादक मंडळाविरुद्ध फौजदारी आणि कोर्ट अवमानना ची कारवाईची नोटीस.

[Covid-19] लोकांनी लसीच्या दुष्परीणामाचे दावे करू नये व लस कंपन्यांचा लाखो कोटींचा फायदा व्हावा यासाठी खोटे नरेटीव्ह चालविणारे डॉ. संजय ओक व दै. लोकमत चे संपादक मंडळाविरुद्ध फौजदारी आणि कोर्ट अवमानना ची कारवाईची नोटीस.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 years ago
लसीच्या दुष्परीणामाला ‘लाँग कोव्हीड सिंड्रोम’ असा खोटा मुलामा दिल्याचा आरोप. केन्द्र शासनाच्या ICMR ने दिलेल्या माहिती वरून...
Read More Read more about [Covid-19] लोकांनी लसीच्या दुष्परीणामाचे दावे करू नये व लस कंपन्यांचा लाखो कोटींचा फायदा व्हावा यासाठी खोटे नरेटीव्ह चालविणारे डॉ. संजय ओक व दै. लोकमत चे संपादक मंडळाविरुद्ध फौजदारी आणि कोर्ट अवमानना ची कारवाईची नोटीस.
[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches. WhatsApp Image 2026-03-08 at 13.20.38

[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 hour ago
The Indian Lawyers and Human Rights Activists Association has filed a complaint before the Hon’ble Chief Justice...
Read More Read more about [Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.
Justice Hidayatullah’s view in 1966 in Naresh Mirajkar’s case was binding precedent as being undisputed and no counter precedent available and Now has become the Binding Law of the Land as Nine-Judge Constitution Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) Confirms Screenshot 2026-02-28 at 21.54.19

Justice Hidayatullah’s view in 1966 in Naresh Mirajkar’s case was binding precedent as being undisputed and no counter precedent available and Now has become the Binding Law of the Land as Nine-Judge Constitution Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) Confirms

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
Now if  a Judge of any Court Violates Your Fundamental Rights Through Words Spoken from the Bench...
Read More Read more about Justice Hidayatullah’s view in 1966 in Naresh Mirajkar’s case was binding precedent as being undisputed and no counter precedent available and Now has become the Binding Law of the Land as Nine-Judge Constitution Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) Confirms
सुप्रीम कोर्टाने तरुण वकिलाचे पत्र जनहित याचिका म्हणून स्वीकारले — याचिका दाखल करताना ‘सीनियर काउन्सिल सर्टिफिकेट’च्या सक्तीमुळे सामान्य नागरिक व ज्युनियर वकिलांच्या हक्कांच्या उल्लंघनाचा मुद्दा ऐरणीवर [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026] image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

सुप्रीम कोर्टाने तरुण वकिलाचे पत्र जनहित याचिका म्हणून स्वीकारले — याचिका दाखल करताना ‘सीनियर काउन्सिल सर्टिफिकेट’च्या सक्तीमुळे सामान्य नागरिक व ज्युनियर वकिलांच्या हक्कांच्या उल्लंघनाचा मुद्दा ऐरणीवर [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
नागरिकांना सुलभ न्याय मिळवण्याच्या संवैधानिक अधिकारावर गदा आणणाऱ्या सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाच्या नियमांतील तरतुदी रद्द करण्याची मागणी यापूर्वीही सर्वोच्च...
Read More Read more about सुप्रीम कोर्टाने तरुण वकिलाचे पत्र जनहित याचिका म्हणून स्वीकारले — याचिका दाखल करताना ‘सीनियर काउन्सिल सर्टिफिकेट’च्या सक्तीमुळे सामान्य नागरिक व ज्युनियर वकिलांच्या हक्कांच्या उल्लंघनाचा मुद्दा ऐरणीवर [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने युवा वकील का पत्र PIL के रूप में दर्ज किया — क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन में ‘सीनियर काउंसिल सर्टिफिकेट’ की अनिवार्यता से आम नागरिकों और जूनियर वकीलों के अधिकारों के हनन का मुद्दा उठाया [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026] 2_03_59_58_supreme-court-_1_H@@IGHT_0_W@@IDTH_600

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने युवा वकील का पत्र PIL के रूप में दर्ज किया — क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन में ‘सीनियर काउंसिल सर्टिफिकेट’ की अनिवार्यता से आम नागरिकों और जूनियर वकीलों के अधिकारों के हनन का मुद्दा उठाया [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
नई दिल्ली। देश के सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने युवा अधिवक्ता एडवोकेट देवकृष्ण भंबरी द्वारा भेजे गए एक महत्वपूर्ण...
Read More Read more about सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने युवा वकील का पत्र PIL के रूप में दर्ज किया — क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन में ‘सीनियर काउंसिल सर्टिफिकेट’ की अनिवार्यता से आम नागरिकों और जूनियर वकीलों के अधिकारों के हनन का मुद्दा उठाया [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]
BREAKING: Supreme Court Registers Young Advocate’s Letter as PIL (E) Challenging Supreme Court Rule putting condition of certificate of Senior Counsel in Curative Petition. [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026] SUPREME-COURT-OF-INDIA

BREAKING: Supreme Court Registers Young Advocate’s Letter as PIL (E) Challenging Supreme Court Rule putting condition of certificate of Senior Counsel in Curative Petition. [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
The Letter PIL was submitted by Adv. Devkrishna Bhambri, Coordinator of the Indian Bar Association, on the...
Read More Read more about BREAKING: Supreme Court Registers Young Advocate’s Letter as PIL (E) Challenging Supreme Court Rule putting condition of certificate of Senior Counsel in Curative Petition. [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

You may have missed

WhatsApp Image 2026-03-08 at 13.20.38

[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 hour ago
Screenshot 2026-02-28 at 21.54.19

Justice Hidayatullah’s view in 1966 in Naresh Mirajkar’s case was binding precedent as being undisputed and no counter precedent available and Now has become the Binding Law of the Land as Nine-Judge Constitution Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) Confirms

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

सुप्रीम कोर्टाने तरुण वकिलाचे पत्र जनहित याचिका म्हणून स्वीकारले — याचिका दाखल करताना ‘सीनियर काउन्सिल सर्टिफिकेट’च्या सक्तीमुळे सामान्य नागरिक व ज्युनियर वकिलांच्या हक्कांच्या उल्लंघनाचा मुद्दा ऐरणीवर [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
2_03_59_58_supreme-court-_1_H@@IGHT_0_W@@IDTH_600

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने युवा वकील का पत्र PIL के रूप में दर्ज किया — क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन में ‘सीनियर काउंसिल सर्टिफिकेट’ की अनिवार्यता से आम नागरिकों और जूनियर वकीलों के अधिकारों के हनन का मुद्दा उठाया [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago