STAY UPDATED WITH SC NEWS

Supreme Court of India

Kapil Sibal, Arvind Kejriwal, Retd. Justice A.S. Oka, Meenakshi Arora, Sanjay Hegade, Live Law, and The Hindu Named in Explosive Complaint Alleging Organised Legal- Media Conspiracy to Influence Pending Judicial Proceedings and Target Judges Delivering Adverse Orders Against the Ecosystem Screenshot 2026-05-14 at 17.04.49

Screenshot 2026-05-14 at 17.04.49

Kapil Sibal, Arvind Kejriwal, Retd. Justice A.S. Oka, Meenakshi Arora, Sanjay Hegade, Live Law, and The Hindu Named in Explosive Complaint Alleging Organised Legal- Media Conspiracy to Influence Pending Judicial Proceedings and Target Judges Delivering Adverse Orders Against the Ecosystem

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 20 hours ago

Complaint Seeks Criminal Prosecution, Contempt Action, Cancellation of Licence to Practice, and Withdrawal of Senior Advocate Designation...

कपिल सिब्बल, अरविंद केजरीवाल, रिटायर्ड जस्टिस ए.एस. ओका, लाइव लॉ और द हिंदू के खिलाफ विस्फोटक संवैधानिक शिकायत. Screenshot 2026-05-14 at 16.56.28

Screenshot 2026-05-14 at 16.56.28

कपिल सिब्बल, अरविंद केजरीवाल, रिटायर्ड जस्टिस ए.एस. ओका, लाइव लॉ और द हिंदू के खिलाफ विस्फोटक संवैधानिक शिकायत.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 20 hours ago

लंबित न्यायिक कार्यवाही को प्रभावित करने और ‘इकोसिस्टम’ के खिलाफ आदेश देने वाले जजों को निशाना बनाने...

Supreme Court Orders Bombay High Court to Adjudicate All Issues in Adv. Nilesh Ojha Case, Negates Earlier HC View that certain issues should be decided by the Supreme Court. Screenshot 2026-02-02 at 22.04.35

Screenshot 2026-02-02 at 22.04.35

Supreme Court Orders Bombay High Court to Adjudicate All Issues in Adv. Nilesh Ojha Case, Negates Earlier HC View that certain issues should be decided by the Supreme Court.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 weeks ago

The judgment also clarifies that allegations against judges are permissible in law only when supported by substantial...

[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.

WhatsApp Image 2026-03-08 at 13.20.38

[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 2 months ago

The Indian Lawyers and Human Rights Activists Association has filed a complaint before the Hon’ble Chief Justice...

Justice Hidayatullah’s view in 1966 in Naresh Mirajkar’s case was binding precedent as being undisputed and no counter precedent available and Now has become the Binding Law of the Land as Nine-Judge Constitution Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) Confirms Screenshot 2026-02-28 at 21.54.19

Screenshot 2026-02-28 at 21.54.19

Justice Hidayatullah’s view in 1966 in Naresh Mirajkar’s case was binding precedent as being undisputed and no counter precedent available and Now has become the Binding Law of the Land as Nine-Judge Constitution Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) Confirms

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 months ago

Now if a Judge of any Court Violates Your Fundamental Rights Through Words Spoken from the Bench...