STAY UPDATED WITH SC NEWS

Rashid Khan Pathan

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने युवा वकील का पत्र PIL के रूप में दर्ज किया — क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन में ‘सीनियर काउंसिल सर्टिफिकेट’ की अनिवार्यता से आम नागरिकों और जूनियर वकीलों के अधिकारों के हनन का मुद्दा उठाया [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026] 2_03_59_58_supreme-court-_1_H@@IGHT_0_W@@IDTH_600

2_03_59_58_supreme-court-_1_H@@IGHT_0_W@@IDTH_600

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने युवा वकील का पत्र PIL के रूप में दर्ज किया — क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन में ‘सीनियर काउंसिल सर्टिफिकेट’ की अनिवार्यता से आम नागरिकों और जूनियर वकीलों के अधिकारों के हनन का मुद्दा उठाया [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 months ago

नई दिल्ली। देश के सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने युवा अधिवक्ता एडवोकेट देवकृष्ण भंबरी द्वारा भेजे गए एक महत्वपूर्ण...

BREAKING: Supreme Court Registers Young Advocate’s Letter as PIL (E) Challenging Supreme Court Rule putting condition of certificate of Senior Counsel in Curative Petition. [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026] SUPREME-COURT-OF-INDIA

SUPREME-COURT-OF-INDIA

BREAKING: Supreme Court Registers Young Advocate’s Letter as PIL (E) Challenging Supreme Court Rule putting condition of certificate of Senior Counsel in Curative Petition. [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 months ago

The Letter PIL was submitted by Adv. Devkrishna Bhambri, Coordinator of the Indian Bar Association, on the...

Final Door to Justice Cannot Be only for the Rich: JALSA and Sanvidhan Rakshak Samiti Urges CJI to Abolish Senior Counsel Certification Requirement for Curative Petitions, Citing Violations of Equality under the Constitution of India and International Covenants including the ICCPR. Screenshot 2025-12-28 at 11.52.13

Screenshot 2025-12-28 at 11.52.13

Final Door to Justice Cannot Be only for the Rich: JALSA and Sanvidhan Rakshak Samiti Urges CJI to Abolish Senior Counsel Certification Requirement for Curative Petitions, Citing Violations of Equality under the Constitution of India and International Covenants including the ICCPR.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 months ago

The Sanvidhan Rakshak Samiti (SRS) and Junior Advocates and Law Students Association (JALSA) contends that the requirement...

An order passed by the Supreme Court in proceedings under Article 136 of the Constitution can, be corrected or set aside in proceedings invoking Article 136 itself. A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak, (1988) 2 SCC 602 (7-J). Screenshot 2026-02-02 at 22.04.35

Screenshot 2026-02-02 at 22.04.35

An order passed by the Supreme Court in proceedings under Article 136 of the Constitution can, be corrected or set aside in proceedings invoking Article 136 itself. A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak, (1988) 2 SCC 602 (7-J).

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 months ago

A Seven-Judge Constitution Bench decision in A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak, (1988) 2 SCC 602, set aside...

The United Nations Human Rights Committee (HRC) can now intervene and examine Adv. Nedumpara’s case concerning his arbitrary conviction for contempt by the Supreme Court and the absence of a right of appeal as mandatorily required under Article 14(5) of the ICCPR. image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

The United Nations Human Rights Committee (HRC) can now intervene and examine Adv. Nedumpara’s case concerning his arbitrary conviction for contempt by the Supreme Court and the absence of a right of appeal as mandatorily required under Article 14(5) of the ICCPR.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 months ago

In several orders including Anthony Michael Emmanuel Fernando v. Sri Lanka, 2005 SCC OnLine HRC 22, decided...