February 16, 2026

Contact Us

    You may have missed

    Screenshot 2026-02-02 at 22.04.35

    An order passed by the Supreme Court in proceedings under Article 136 of the Constitution can, be corrected or set aside in proceedings invoking Article 136 itself. A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak, (1988) 2 SCC 602 (7-J).

    Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 hours ago
    image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

    The United Nations Human Rights Committee (HRC) can now intervene and examine Adv. Nedumpara’s case concerning his arbitrary conviction for contempt by the Supreme Court and the absence of a right of appeal as mandatorily required under Article 14(5) of the ICCPR.

    Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 21 hours ago
    2_03_59_58_supreme-court-_1_H@@IGHT_0_W@@IDTH_600

    The Supreme Court rule permitting dismissal of a review petition without hearing and without recording reasons is unconstitutional, as it violates fundamental rights, denies fair procedure, and disregards the caution expressed by the Seven-Judge Constitution Bench.

    Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 21 hours ago
    image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

    When Is a Writ Petition Maintainable Against Unlawful Orders of the Supreme Court?

    Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago