February 24, 2026

Supreme Court of India

आरोपी परिवहन अधिकाऱ्यांच्या खोट्या नॅरेटिव्हचे पितळ उघड. DALL·E 2024-05-16 09.55.14 - An animated scene depicting traffic police officers in uniform standing in front of the Supreme Court of India. The officers are managing traffic, wit

आरोपी परिवहन अधिकाऱ्यांच्या खोट्या नॅरेटिव्हचे पितळ उघड.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 months ago
सुप्रीम कोर्ट आणि हायकोर्ट पक्षकार संघटनेच्या विधी विभागाच्या सचिवांच्या लेखी स्पष्टीकरणामुळे आरोपींचा खोटेपणा पूर्णपणे उघडकीस. वरिष्ठ न्यायालयाचा...
Read More Read more about आरोपी परिवहन अधिकाऱ्यांच्या खोट्या नॅरेटिव्हचे पितळ उघड.
Gross Professional Misconduct:- A complaint has been filed against Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra for misleading the Delhi High Court by relying on overruled judgments in an attempt to secure the conviction of various advocates practicing at the Tis Hazari Courts. 1352143_Wallpaper2

Gross Professional Misconduct:- A complaint has been filed against Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra for misleading the Delhi High Court by relying on overruled judgments in an attempt to secure the conviction of various advocates practicing at the Tis Hazari Courts.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 months ago
The Indian Lawyers and Human Rights Activists Association, which filed the complaint, has also produced documentary evidence...
Read More Read more about Gross Professional Misconduct:- A complaint has been filed against Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra for misleading the Delhi High Court by relying on overruled judgments in an attempt to secure the conviction of various advocates practicing at the Tis Hazari Courts.
A three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Bhushan Gavai, has issued an exceptionally strong and unprecedented caution to Judges of the Supreme Court itself, stressing that they must remain vigilant, careful, and disciplined, and must avoid passing orders that contradict binding precedents. ghdf_60cc70cd645b7

A three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Bhushan Gavai, has issued an exceptionally strong and unprecedented caution to Judges of the Supreme Court itself, stressing that they must remain vigilant, careful, and disciplined, and must avoid passing orders that contradict binding precedents.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 months ago
A three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Bhushan Gavai, has issued an exceptionally...
Read More Read more about A three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice Bhushan Gavai, has issued an exceptionally strong and unprecedented caution to Judges of the Supreme Court itself, stressing that they must remain vigilant, careful, and disciplined, and must avoid passing orders that contradict binding precedents.
The Constitution Bench has categorically held that any citizen may file a contempt petition against any Judge, and the Supreme Court is bound to examine it on merits. [Re: C. S. Karnan (2017) 7 SCC 1] Supreme-Court-of-India

The Constitution Bench has categorically held that any citizen may file a contempt petition against any Judge, and the Supreme Court is bound to examine it on merits. [Re: C. S. Karnan (2017) 7 SCC 1]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 months ago
It has been unequivocally ruled that non-adherence by Judges of all Courts—including High Courts—to binding Supreme Court...
Read More Read more about The Constitution Bench has categorically held that any citizen may file a contempt petition against any Judge, and the Supreme Court is bound to examine it on merits. [Re: C. S. Karnan (2017) 7 SCC 1]
[फॅक्ट चेक] नागपूरचे आरटीओ विजय चव्हाण व इतरांविरुद्ध चालू असलेल्या गंभीर चौकशीतील आरोप, प्रत्यारोप व सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाचे निर्णय supreme-court-4 (3)

[फॅक्ट चेक] नागपूरचे आरटीओ विजय चव्हाण व इतरांविरुद्ध चालू असलेल्या गंभीर चौकशीतील आरोप, प्रत्यारोप व सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाचे निर्णय

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 months ago
या प्रकरणातील अधिकृत दस्तऐवज, पोलीस अहवाल, न्यायालयीन निष्कर्ष आणि सुप्रीम कोर्ट निर्देशांचे प्राथमिक विश्लेषण केल्यावर अनेक धक्कादायक...
Read More Read more about [फॅक्ट चेक] नागपूरचे आरटीओ विजय चव्हाण व इतरांविरुद्ध चालू असलेल्या गंभीर चौकशीतील आरोप, प्रत्यारोप व सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाचे निर्णय

You may have missed

Screenshot 2025-12-28 at 11.52.13

Final Door to Justice Cannot Be only for the Rich: JALSA and Sanvidhan Rakshak Samiti Urges CJI to Abolish Senior Counsel Certification Requirement for Curative Petitions, Citing Violations of Equality under the Constitution of India and International Covenants including the ICCPR.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 7 days ago
Screenshot 2026-02-02 at 22.04.35

An order passed by the Supreme Court in proceedings under Article 136 of the Constitution can, be corrected or set aside in proceedings invoking Article 136 itself. A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak, (1988) 2 SCC 602 (7-J).

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

The United Nations Human Rights Committee (HRC) can now intervene and examine Adv. Nedumpara’s case concerning his arbitrary conviction for contempt by the Supreme Court and the absence of a right of appeal as mandatorily required under Article 14(5) of the ICCPR.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago
2_03_59_58_supreme-court-_1_H@@IGHT_0_W@@IDTH_600

The Supreme Court rule permitting dismissal of a review petition without hearing and without recording reasons is unconstitutional, as it violates fundamental rights, denies fair procedure, and disregards the caution expressed by the Seven-Judge Constitution Bench.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 week ago