March 25, 2026

अदित्य ठाकरे

Breaking: Major Trouble for Aditya Thackeray – Disha Salian’s Father Moves Bombay High Court Seeking FIR for Gang Rape and Arrest of Aditya & Uddhav Thackeray, Rhea Chakraborty, and Others disha-salian-scaled

Breaking: Major Trouble for Aditya Thackeray – Disha Salian’s Father Moves Bombay High Court Seeking FIR for Gang Rape and Arrest of Aditya & Uddhav Thackeray, Rhea Chakraborty, and Others

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 year ago
Petitioner in his petition had given crucial evidences exposing falsity dishonesty of Malvani Mumbai Police in creating...
Read More Read more about Breaking: Major Trouble for Aditya Thackeray – Disha Salian’s Father Moves Bombay High Court Seeking FIR for Gang Rape and Arrest of Aditya & Uddhav Thackeray, Rhea Chakraborty, and Others
[Big Breaking] Sushant Singh Rajput & Disha Salian Murder Case: High Court Hearing Update 8568fc270bb16349a2e55ab8b76fa506169763416516593_original

[Big Breaking] Sushant Singh Rajput & Disha Salian Murder Case: High Court Hearing Update

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 1 year ago
The Hon’ble High Court, during today’s proceedings, took exception to Aditya Thackeray’s intervention in the Public Interest...
Read More Read more about [Big Breaking] Sushant Singh Rajput & Disha Salian Murder Case: High Court Hearing Update
ज्या ३४० च्या कायद्याने शरद पवारांना बेजार केले व तडजोड करण्यास भाग पाडले त्याच कायद्याच्या कचाट्यात आदित्य ठाकरे अडकले. WhatsApp Image 2024-01-12 at 13.45.14_e75cf1ba

ज्या ३४० च्या कायद्याने शरद पवारांना बेजार केले व तडजोड करण्यास भाग पाडले त्याच कायद्याच्या कचाट्यात आदित्य ठाकरे अडकले.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 2 years ago
शरद पवारांच्या बाजूने सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने दिलेला निकाल वरीष्ठ खंडपीठाकडून गैरकायदेशीर  घोषित. उच्च न्यायालयाकडूनही दि. 9 January 2023...
Read More Read more about ज्या ३४० च्या कायद्याने शरद पवारांना बेजार केले व तडजोड करण्यास भाग पाडले त्याच कायद्याच्या कचाट्यात आदित्य ठाकरे अडकले.

You may have missed

WhatsApp Image 2026-03-08 at 13.20.38

[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 2 weeks ago
Screenshot 2026-02-28 at 21.54.19

Justice Hidayatullah’s view in 1966 in Naresh Mirajkar’s case was binding precedent as being undisputed and no counter precedent available and Now has become the Binding Law of the Land as Nine-Judge Constitution Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) Confirms

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 weeks ago
image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

सुप्रीम कोर्टाने तरुण वकिलाचे पत्र जनहित याचिका म्हणून स्वीकारले — याचिका दाखल करताना ‘सीनियर काउन्सिल सर्टिफिकेट’च्या सक्तीमुळे सामान्य नागरिक व ज्युनियर वकिलांच्या हक्कांच्या उल्लंघनाचा मुद्दा ऐरणीवर [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 weeks ago
2_03_59_58_supreme-court-_1_H@@IGHT_0_W@@IDTH_600

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने युवा वकील का पत्र PIL के रूप में दर्ज किया — क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन में ‘सीनियर काउंसिल सर्टिफिकेट’ की अनिवार्यता से आम नागरिकों और जूनियर वकीलों के अधिकारों के हनन का मुद्दा उठाया [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 weeks ago