March 22, 2026

Rashid Khan Pathan

[महत्वाचे] किरीट सौमय्या जामीनप्रकारणात न्यायालयाविरुद्ध बेताल, खोटे व अवमानजनक आरोप करने संजय राऊतांना भोवले.

[महत्वाचे] किरीट सौमय्या जामीनप्रकारणात न्यायालयाविरुद्ध बेताल, खोटे व अवमानजनक आरोप करने संजय राऊतांना भोवले.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 years ago
संजय राऊत, उद्धव ठाकरे व दिलीप वळसे पाटीलांविरुद्ध उच्च न्यायालयात कोर्ट अवमानना याचिका दाखल. [PIL (St) 9849...
Read More Read more about [महत्वाचे] किरीट सौमय्या जामीनप्रकारणात न्यायालयाविरुद्ध बेताल, खोटे व अवमानजनक आरोप करने संजय राऊतांना भोवले.
Misleading news regarding mask & vaccine. Legal notice issued to Editor & Reporter of Navbharat Times. legal-notice--1024x683.jpg

Misleading news regarding mask & vaccine. Legal notice issued to Editor & Reporter of Navbharat Times.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 years ago
Misleading news regarding mask & vaccine. Legal notice issued to Editor & Reporter of Navbharat Times. Legal Notice...
Read More Read more about Misleading news regarding mask & vaccine. Legal notice issued to Editor & Reporter of Navbharat Times.
[Vaccine Mandate] Judgment of Madras High Court on vaccination is per-incuriam and in Contempt of Supreme Court decision in Common Cause’s case (2018) 5 SCC 1. Chennai_High_Court.jpg

[Vaccine Mandate] Judgment of Madras High Court on vaccination is per-incuriam and in Contempt of Supreme Court decision in Common Cause’s case (2018) 5 SCC 1.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 4 years ago
Judgment of Madras High Court on vaccination is per-incuriam and in Contempt of Supreme Court decision in Common...
Read More Read more about [Vaccine Mandate] Judgment of Madras High Court on vaccination is per-incuriam and in Contempt of Supreme Court decision in Common Cause’s case (2018) 5 SCC 1.

You may have missed

WhatsApp Image 2026-03-08 at 13.20.38

[Shocking] A two-judge Bench headed by Justice B.V. Nagarathna dismissed a petition filed in accordance with the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in In Re: C.S. Karnan, (2017) 7 SCC 1, imposed costs on the petitioner, and made discourteous and intimidating remarks cautioning advocates who in fact had filed the petition as per law settled by the larger benches.

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 2 weeks ago
Screenshot 2026-02-28 at 21.54.19

Justice Hidayatullah’s view in 1966 in Naresh Mirajkar’s case was binding precedent as being undisputed and no counter precedent available and Now has become the Binding Law of the Land as Nine-Judge Constitution Bench in Puttaswamy (2017) Confirms

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 weeks ago
image-750x-2023-10-28-10_01_43pm-653d376f8f3b2

सुप्रीम कोर्टाने तरुण वकिलाचे पत्र जनहित याचिका म्हणून स्वीकारले — याचिका दाखल करताना ‘सीनियर काउन्सिल सर्टिफिकेट’च्या सक्तीमुळे सामान्य नागरिक व ज्युनियर वकिलांच्या हक्कांच्या उल्लंघनाचा मुद्दा ऐरणीवर [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 weeks ago
2_03_59_58_supreme-court-_1_H@@IGHT_0_W@@IDTH_600

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने युवा वकील का पत्र PIL के रूप में दर्ज किया — क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन में ‘सीनियर काउंसिल सर्टिफिकेट’ की अनिवार्यता से आम नागरिकों और जूनियर वकीलों के अधिकारों के हनन का मुद्दा उठाया [SCI/PIL/18039/L/2026]

Rashid Khan Pathan Posted on 3 weeks ago